Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pre columbian puerto sexuality


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. SpinningSpark 23:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Pre columbian puerto sexuality

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page has no place in an encyclopaedia. It is written like an essay, and has no claim to significance. The "sources" this page cites are unreliable or unrelated to the subject of this article. This article also contains what could be categorized as pornographic content. Ethanlu121 (talk) 22:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not encyclopedicly writen and I'm not sure about the sources.&#42;Treker (talk) 22:45, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete At best deserves a merge to some article about Indigenous peoples of the Americas (it's very unclear as to what people exactly, as the subject matter is about two continents with vastly different groups of people). However the article is written very messily and I don't think anything can be salvaged from this. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 22:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Nothing comes up by searching through the above "Find Sources". A search of Questia shows the authors listed at the bottom of the article have actually written about sexuality, transgender issues, etc. I'm not sure about the specific titles listed next to their names. However, the way this is written reads like a personal essay. WP:NOTESSAY. — Maile  (talk) 23:06, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete -- don't merge, just kill it. Quis separabit?  23:21, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Clearly an essay with little to no basis in research or fact ("men had sex with men without being seen as homosexual"). Does not belong in an encyclopedia. R. A. S immons Talk 23:40, 15 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.