Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precision Technologies Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:23, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Precision Technologies Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article. Company fails notability. Absolutely no info from trusted or notable sources, all google results are general ones relating to it being a registered British company and absolutely nothing else. Rayman60 (talk) 00:51, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, I do not see any notability as per WP:N.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:13, 8 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 00:50, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now unfortunately as although its age and history would've certainly guaranteed a notable and acceptable article, my searches found nothing better than coverage including like what's currently listed, at News and browsers. Absolutely nothing to suggest a currently better article. Notifying past users and  (even though the latter seems to be not entirely active).  SwisterTwister   talk  06:11, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.