Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precision cut kidney slices


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Precision cut kidney slices

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Like precision cut tissue slices, this appears to have been created by a now-blocked paid editor, and is of uneven quality. Precision cut lung slices was created at the same time, but seems more informative. (I mention it in case someone wants to nominate it as well.) -- Beland (talk) 02:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Precision cut tissue slices has been deleted. Do you see another potential Merge topic? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:45, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Beland (talk) 02:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment All the articles you mentioned read like college essays. There are brief references to some real publications, but no backing for other statements. It's all loaded with WP:OR. If anything, make precision cut tissue slices the main article, then merge the remaining to that. Otherwise, this probably could have been Speedy deleted? Conyo14 (talk) 07:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge to precision cut tissue slices and trim that article down to remove all the lab cruft. All of these articles could be merged into a single article shorter than this one with no loss of useful content. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 14:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. WP:NOTTEXTBOOK, WP:INDISCRIMINATE. The creator is indeffed for undisclosed paid editing. — Maile (talk) 15:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.