Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preciso de Ti (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ...for now; I'll recommend reassessment of the sources on the talk page of the article; no prejudice against an early renomination if the discussions result in sources being downgraded. (non-admin closure) Lourdes  02:39, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Preciso de Ti
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Still fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG. Notability is not inherited. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 20:16, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GSS (talk |c|em ) 16:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC) Very Weak Keep: It appears to qualify as a notable album based on WP:NALBUM Criteria 3 (Certified Gold or higher). How would one go about confirming the album being certified diamond in Brazil? Note that there is also a statement regarding notability only being appropriate if there is enough material to warrant a detailed article. Right now it is scraping the barrel of being a detailed article. Macktheknifeau (talk) 14:55, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep not a strong keep since the notability is in a different language, but a keep nevertheless: based on the sources, appears to meet WP:GNG (as the best-selling album of all time in that genre, if I understand correctly). SportingFlyer  talk  22:06, 11 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.