Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Precotting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P | Talk 12:36, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Precotting
Non-notable neologism dicdef. Thue | talk 22:16, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 22:17, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism, dicdef, no significant currency. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 11:49, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Should be moved to wiktionary. Not deleted. Big Booger 15:16, 8 November 2005 (UTC)]
 * That's a "transwiki" vote, then, not a "keep" vote, because once something has been moved to Wiktionary it is then deleted from Wikipedia. Oh, and Wiktionary does have basic requirements for inclusion, you know.  Have you checked that this word would meet their standards?  &mdash; Haeleth Talk 16:59, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Don't worry too much about it, Haeleth - I think the vote is just Big Booger wikistalking me on AfD a little bit. I think he/she/it has got bored of it already :) ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 21:53, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete neologisms. Heck, the word's even spelt differently in the title and the article! &mdash; Haeleth Talk 16:59, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --Rogerd 03:02, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.