Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PredictWind


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:39, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

PredictWind

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  C T J F 8 3  chat 01:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * It looks like advertisement. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:53, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, doesn't look like one to me. Has sources.  –BuickCenturyDriver 10:02, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  11:37, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  -- Pcap  ping  11:37, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like advertising to me: ...allows its users to choose their preferred locations from amongst 20,000 locations from around the world... uses a sophisticated weather model....PredictWind is a subscription based service and has a free trial and a variety of payment options. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:45, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak Delete It looks like the article was created by Nathan May, PredictWind site owner. It also reads like an advertisement. --Dc987 (talk) 09:49, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Pure advertising spam. No independent references, just self-referential. --MelanieN (talk) 03:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertisement for non-notable website, there are some references to the site in the "news" website www.sail-world.com, but PredictWind is also a sponsor of this "news" website, so this isn't an independent source. Tim Vickers (talk) 23:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.