Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predictions for Harry Potter 7


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. We are not a crystal ball. --Core desat 03:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Predictions for Harry Potter 7

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

unsourced speculation (disputed prod) Rick Block (talk) 12:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - blatant and unsourced crystal balling. MER-C 13:36, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete pretty much the perfect example of a crystal ball rule situation. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not to beat a dead horse or anything, but definite crystal here. -- Cy ru s      An dir on   13:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom SmartGuy 14:08, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Prediction - Deleted. The future looks cloudy for this case of crystalballery.  A r k y a n  &#149; (talk) 15:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom, WP:CRYSTAL.  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 16:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL HornandsoccerTalk 19:42, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * delete as crystalballery. Only one sure fact - Harry's relation (or not) to Dumbledore - is confirmable.  --Dennisthe2 20:01, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - no earthly reason to keep it. Besides, surely it should be under Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows anyway. -  irides centi   (talk to me!)  20:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete* Most of this is just speculation, and the very few facts are already mentioned in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. This belongs on a fanboard, not on wikipedia. Neville Longbottom 19:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.