Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preditors and Editors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Canley (talk) 05:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Preditors and Editors

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Is this a sufficiently notable Web site? It doesn't seem so to me, but I'd like to see how the community thinks. For now, my opinion is delete. --Nlu (talk) 06:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 06:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep but source. Google Books and Google News results (excluding press releases) indicate some domain notability. --Dhartung | Talk 06:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: While I cannot recall seeing a profile devoted to the site, given the number of times it gets mentioned (along with Writer Beware) as a resource for aspiring writers, I think it passes the notability requirements. This includes mentions a couple times a year in the magazines for just about every professional fiction writer organization out there (RWA, SFWA, MWA, NWU, et cet). —Quasirandom (talk) 19:52, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.