Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preeden


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. A reasonable G11. Would also have met A7. Regards  So Why  14:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Preeden

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

spam IconicBigBen (talk) 23:44, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete It was tagged. Why was the speedy tag replaced with an afd? Eeekster (talk) 23:46, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought it was best. IconicBigBen (talk) 23:48, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, please explain why you thought it was best. Eeekster (talk) 23:51, 24 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  00:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD-G11 as originally tagged by Eeekster. Jarkeld (talk) 01:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, spam/db-corp, no need for AFD. Hairhorn (talk) 01:09, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Looks to me like the consensus is to speedy and I have speedied it, but it would be nice to get one more voice in here; if one more person agrees (admin or not), then please close this. If you disagree, please say so. - Dank (push to talk) 14:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.