Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preeya singh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  14:15, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Preeya singh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not independently notable yet and my searches found nothing convincing and whether intentional or not, the article a bit more like a personal page than an encyclopedia. I considered redirecting to the one film but I wonder if deletion is the better option for now. SwisterTwister  talk  04:03, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The most obvious hint that this vanity page should be Deleted is that the person failed to capitalize their own last name when making it. TiC (talk) 05:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:54, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:54, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, WP:TOOSOON at best. A single film role in an upcoming film is not enough to be included in an encyclopedia. Nothing substantive found in my searches. Cavarrone 09:14, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - might be WP:TOOSOON, but that might not be true. The current page misrepresents her role in the single film she appears in, she's a supporting cast member, and it is unclear how large the role is. The single source does not even mention her. The other 3 references on the film's webpage also do not mention this actress. And if you look at the history of the film page, this might not even be the correct Singh. News Searches, JStor and Highbeam all return zero results.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:15, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Utter joke. This "encyclopedia" article has roughly one publicity shot per word. No substantial RS coverage. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 23:35, 13 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete- Clear case of WP:TOOSOON and fails significance coverage in independent sources. — CutestPenguinHangout 14:49, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.