Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prefixmag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was '''delete. not notable at present'''. Aksi_great (talk) 10:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Prefixmag


non notable websites Ag afd 00:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete No notability. Delete. Arctic-Editor 20:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - no assertion of notability. So tagged. MER-C 02:15, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I removed the speedy tag due to Night Gyr's Keep opinion below. hateless 03:16, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, magazine has 45 employees and has been around for several years. Seems notable but needs that made clear in the article. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 02:48, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment The article as it is now is deletable, but this should be done without prejudice against recreation since it seems like an acceptable topic for an article. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 18:58, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not seeing any encyclopedic notability even being asserted, let alone substantiatedBwithh 04:56, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notability. Resolute 04:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unless improved, per lack of assertion of notability. If there's something that makes it notable, it needs to be placed in the article. Otherwise, the only thing keeping me from hitting the delete button right now is Night Gyr's comment above. theProject 06:03, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable and a single sentence stub.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   13:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete wow, 45 employees. Rever e ndG 22:23, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete My instant gut-reaction to the article is "so what?". Maybe over-extreme, but no notability asserted or obvious.--Anthony.bradbury 23:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete -- NN, probably a vanity article fishing for links. Pete Fenelon 01:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.