Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pregnancy Twist


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, snow close. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Pregnancy Twist

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is about a short film that is claimed to have been released within the last few days. However, no sources are provided, and I can't find any sites (other than Wikipedia and possibly mirrors of it) that even mention this film -- not even a Facebook page for the film or anything like that. The film does not even have an IMDb listing and clearly does not satisfy any criteria at Notability (films). I don't think any speedy deletion criteria apply, and the article has already been WP:PRODed once with the proposed deletion being rejected by the article creator, so I am taking this page to AFD so it can be deleted. Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:13, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:18, 2 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Could even be a hoax, as nothing is verifiable. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:45, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per nom. Hoax is likely. Nothing checks out. A film made 6 year ago but was released on Sunday. The only time I have ever known a film to be released on that day of the week is if Christmas is the same day. There are google hits for some of the names listed but none of them are in the film business that I can find. I checked youtube on the off chance that this is a amateur production and found nothing. Lastly a 15 minute film that engenders this edit summary when removing the prod strains AGF to the breaking point. Further the IP creates the draft version Draft:Pregnancy Twist at 14:46. Even though it has not been submitted for review it gets moved to main space three minutes later. IMO our chain is being well and fully yanked. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 06:10, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; it's likely that the article is a hoax, because none of the content on the article is verifiable.  -Fim atic   (talk &#124; contribs) 07:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as an unsourced hoax that probably should have been CSD G3'd. There's still a userspace draft that, if improved, I guess could try to go through the submission process like any other. Well, assuming this isn't a total hoax. So long as the article is up it's also a passive BLP violation against those persons listed. ♪ Tstorm(talk) 08:46, 2 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete until such time (if ever) that the project by these two Canadian youngsters can meet WP:NF. At kindest, this is waaaaay TOO SOON.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 11:52, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, definitely not notable, no references and I can't find any coverage. Also could be a hoax. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 15:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.