Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pregnancy photography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –MuZemike 23:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Pregnancy photography

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Pure WP:OR and WP:ESSAY; no sources at all. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 13:11, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Borderline advertisement for the artist about a "trend" that does not seem to have any coverage. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 14:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Spam for one photographer. &mdash; RHaworth 17:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: it's worth deleting the photos that were uploaded, too. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 17:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I have gone through the process at commons for the deletion of these images. The discussion page is located here if you wish to comment. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 23:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and all above.  freshacconci  talk talk  18:08, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikidvertising at best. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raisescale (talk • contribs) 20:19, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Symbol oppose vote.svg|20px]] Contra Pure advertisment, currently we have a discussion to delete those "pictures" on commons (klick). --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:11, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pregnancy fetishism, or possibly delete. MKFI (talk) 19:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirecting to pregnancy fetishism would imply that all photography of pregnancy is fetishism. The implications of such a line of thought are a bit disturbing.--Prosfilaes (talk) 12:29, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.