Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premier 993 (National Express West Midlands)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 22:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Premier 993 (National Express West Midlands)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a seemingly non notable bus route which I have already once redirected to List of bus routes in the West Midlands county after attempting to establish a consensus on WP:UKBRQDRIVE. The ideal outcome would not be delete, but to redirect again, as above. There is no encyclopaedic content I can see that would warrant keeping, and I can find no reliable sources to establish notability. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  22:07, 19 February 2009 (UTC) 
 * Speedy keep as the nominator does not wish the article to be deleted. Stifle (talk) 22:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC) No longer applicable; now neutral. Stifle (talk) 14:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment the nominator does want the article deleted. originally I added prod templates to these, but were redirected at the request of an administrator. Jenuk1985  |  Talk  22:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I added the remark about ideal outcome being redirect because it is the same as other articles in the same batch that I "prodded". Personally I feel deletion for these articles is best, as the redirects serve no useful purpose. Jenuk1985  |  Talk  22:38, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability; seems to be an unlikely search term to me. JulesH (talk) 12:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep This is one of these routes, like the 997, which is a Partnership route with WMPTE (Centro) which is one of 6, like the 934, 1, 377 and 451 being deleted. Therefore i hearby demand that this is kept.  Me Myself  and Iwith the UK Transport Wiki 17:36, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Can you give a valid reasoning to keep? Secret account 14:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of noteability. Jtrainor (talk) 22:25, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Could potentially be useful.  -  down  load  |  sign!  00:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:USEFUL Secret account 14:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable bus route, may be enough for a transport wiki but not WP. Letsdrinktea (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Given their importance in the community, and that there are always sources, I think we would do well to consider every bus route as notable. Thy've sometimes been excluded as not being stable enough for article, but I think that is not generally the case.DGG (talk) 01:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable sources for an article. Bus-routes are just as important as the local supermarket or post office, but they don't have articles because of notability. Secret account 14:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.