Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premier Private Jets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Premier Private Jets

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP, especially with respect to WP:CORPDEPTH. —  Newslinger  talk   08:58, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Analysis of sources:
 * Manta.com: Insignificant and indiscriminate directory listing.
 * Stuart Magazine: Sponsored content, not reliable or independent.
 * Premier Private Jets: The company's website. Not independent.
 * CHEQ Operator Registry: Insignificant directory listing.
 * Aviation Pros: Press release. Not independent.
 * Inc.: Insignificant listing with #2,262 ranking.


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —  Newslinger   talk   09:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. —  Newslinger   talk   09:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. —  Newslinger   talk   09:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. —  Newslinger   talk   09:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominiation. In its original state, the article could have been speedied G11. With all of the spam cleared out, there's little left. I can find passing mentions of the company in their local press and a few aviation mags, but no substantial coverage per WP:CORPDEPTH. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 09:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - notability not established Mujinga (talk) 22:22, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:23, 16 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - no significant independent news coverage. I also searched on newspapers.com for any articles that may have been written about the company in newspapers that aren't necessarily online and came up empty, although the name is comprised of very common words that generate tons of false matches.  I also searched by the name of the company owner and also came up empty. RecycledPixels (talk) 15:48, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages or a platform for promotion. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 17:46, 17 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.