Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premier World Capital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:33, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Premier World Capital

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company; page likely created for marketing purposes –  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 01:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. –  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee  (Oh hai) 01:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:04, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:04, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Deletion Fails WP:GNG and some of it sources are from the company's own website. Signed, The4lines &#124;&#124;&#124;&#124; (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 17:33, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * KEEP As reviewed previously by admin Espresso Addict, deletion should be declined as claims are present. Furthermore, all the statements in the article are supported by sources. Of the sources listed, 9 are from reputable sources such as Bloomberg, Financial Times, Reuters, The Economic Times and Markets Insider. 3lack5tar (talk) 08:26, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The sources should be used to show notability, but that's not what's happening here. Company information pages -- even from Bloomberg, Reuters, etc. -- do not establish notability. –  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 17:46, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Not all the sources are company information pages. Nevertheless, I have also improved on the article by adding 7 new sources that contain reports on the company's activities to enhance notability. 3lack5tar (talk) 09:35, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:10, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
 * As mentioned previously, this article was reviewed previously by admin Espresso Addict and deletion should be declined as claims are present. Additionally, to enhance the article further, a total of 12 new sources that contain reports on the company's activities have been added to further enhance notability. 3lack5tar (talk) 16:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –&#8239;Joe (talk) 12:23, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the references are mostly director listings and self-published sources which merely establishes the fact that this company exists but doesn't mention why it is notable for inclusion. Fails to meet WP:CORP. -- KartikeyaS (talk) 12:47, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * KEEP strike duplicate !vote There are at least 15 independent news sources that contain reports on the company's activities (e.g. buying over corporate operations, securing refinance, winning awards for corporate lending performance, penalties for flouting certain regulatory standards etc.).  3lack5tar (talk) 18:26, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability as none contain "Independent Content" as per ORGIND, references are a mix of run-of-the-mill financial announcements and PR, topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing++ 11:38, 13 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.