Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premier Youthwork (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Premier Youthwork (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I found no significant coverage for this magazine. The article fails WP:N because there is only trivial coverage. SL93 (talk) 23:02, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - No references at all to establish nobility. Existence does not prove notability.  CookieMonster755   (talk)   04:37, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - No indication of notability is provided.--Rpclod (talk) 05:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Multiple searches found nothing significant or in-depth and a search Google UK found the same. Considering Christian publications aren't always going to get attention especially if they're independent but considering these links mention them alongside the other magazines and parent company, I would've supported redirect to Premier Christian Media but it can't be done. SwisterTwister   talk  05:15, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak keep -- Christian magazines do not necessaarily get that much publicity within the mainstream media. My understanding is that this is a specialist non-academic magazine, for church youth pastors and leaders of evangelical churches.  With the decline of print media generally and the rise of the Internet, magazines like this are inclined to struggle.  The transfer of ownership suggests that this one is also struggling.  However I would suggest that it is a significant niche magazine and thus notable.  As long as its publication continues, I would suggest that we should keep it.  Evangelicalism is mainstream, not FRINGE.  Peterkingiron (talk) 09:51, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Peterkingiron If you in fact can locate significant coverage of this magazine, say, in unrelated small Christian sources, ping me and I'll take a close look.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete No coverage. Delete per nom. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:23, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.