Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premiere Speakers Bureau


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  20:22, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Premiere Speakers Bureau
Blatant advertising page. The creation of this article coincides with a second spamming of links onto the articles of their speakers. Will Beback 20:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertisement, no encyclopedical content. Pavel Vozenilek 21:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Bucketsofg 22:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's a clear advert Cordless larry 23:26, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, while the page does not have very much original substantive content, I don't think its just advertising. In shows historical information related to the organization and these individuals. Since Premiere is their agent it would akin to talking about NBC News and not mentioning Tom Brokow or vice versa. However, I agree that the extent of the list should be changed to only discuss newsworthy individuals... As well as adding more profile information about the company. johnmcgary 16:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, clear advert. And apologies for the previous invective.  Some bile from an edit war spilled over on to this page. Eleemosynary 03:23, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey man, its fine to call me out on content all day long, but you dont have to be mean about it. johnmcgary 01:50, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. John is correct. We need to treat all editors with respect, even those who may have come with aims that don't match those of the project. The contributions may be unacceptable, but we welcome the editor. I suspect that, in good faith, he did not realize how things work here. If the company is notable, someone unassociated with it will write an article. -Will Beback 04:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.