Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Premises (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mz7 (talk) 04:53, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Premises
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poor quality dictionary article Rathfelder (talk) 21:45, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Rathfelder (talk) 21:45, 31 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Strong keep - AFD is not cleanup. Besides the history of the word which related to the part of a deed for the transfer of land, the term is used in property law, tort law, and depending on the country, other legislative concepts (e.g. there is Australian legislation where the term is relevant for liquor licensing, and primary industry). Bookscale (talk) 21:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Concur with User:Bookscale. Article serves a useful purpose and I can see where it would be useful to many people.Knox490 (talk) 03:53, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - this is a perfectly valid legal stub start of an article. It's been viewed almost 3,000 times in the past 30 days, so our readers are looking for it, on average 100 times a day. Bearian (talk) 18:08, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - An important and notable legal concept clearly deserving of an independent article. May His Shadow Fall Upon You     Talk  17:30, 5 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.