Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preparation for flow cytometry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 21:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Preparation for flow cytometry

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't really know what to say about this article except that it's an utterly explicit violation of WP:NOTHOW that doesn't even seem to follow the sole source cited. That there are those, including the article's author, who disagree with the policy can be seen by reading Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not; but it's policy nonetheless. Deor (talk) 22:03, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a well-written article, but it is very much a how-to article, which is against policy. Sorry. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 22:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

So what if I were to spend some time transforming the article into a more objective, more encyclopedic, and less how-to-ish entry? Would that work? Aelindor (talk) 00:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The problem is that it does not belong in an encylopaedia. What you should do with this, since you clearly spent a lot of time and effort on it, is look for a home for it in Wikibooks. -Kieran (talk) 20:40, 14 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Violates WP:NOTHOW and an appropriate article on flow cytometry already exists, so I don't see how this could be cleaned up without duplicating information in the existing article. Amazinglarry (talk) 02:57, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Blatant policy violation. Abductive  (reasoning) 03:40, 14 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per current policy, not appropriate  Chzz  ►  04:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE. Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 04:27, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. -Kieran (talk) 20:40, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.