Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preparis Inc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 05:31, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Preparis Inc

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional page for non-notable company. Aksnahar (talk) 16:54, 2 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment - Page was created without afd2 template and never transcluded to a daily log. One of a series of malformed nominations by an account with few edits.  Fixed now--I offer no opinion on the nomination itself at this time.  -- Finngall   talk  17:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:04, 11 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  01:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist &mdash; Music1201  talk  15:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Promotion for company lacking coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:55, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  15:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. non notable company. The references are only press releases and the like about its financing.  DGG ( talk ) 23:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. What does Preparis Inc do? I'm serious. "Provides business continuity and cybersecurity software" to a bunch of other companies? "Cybersecurity," okay, but "business continuity"? Like if there's a tornado that destroys the client's server hardware, or a flash flood? Without third-party coverage of the importance and notability of this company's products, these are nothing but despicable self-aggrandizing buzzwords. Wikipedians hitting the "random article" button ought never end up on a page for an entity whose actual business activities remain a mystery even after closely reading the article. What does this company do? Don't tell me I'm too stupid; I can read Bose–Einstein condensate and get the gist of it. This is unimportant jargon on top of unimportant jargon and Wikipedia has better things to do. -  Julietdeltalima    (talk)  23:48, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as by far nothing actually convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  23:49, 31 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.