Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preposterous words in the english language

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 15:19, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Preposterous words in the english language
This is rather, uh, preposterous - a "list" of 3 terms under an inherently POV article title -- Ferkelparade &pi; 10:57, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Well bugger you you ********. I don't care what you think - George W Bush is a pillock!
 * Above comment by User:217.33.207.195, creator of the article.
 * Delete, there is no way, we can manage editing this article objectively. Mgm|(talk) 11:10, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I doubt that any of these words even exist.  -- R yan!  |  Talk  11:20, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Concur, Delete. Radiant! 11:26, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - DavidWBrooks 11:27, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * The George W Bush comment ties this in with the past vandalism from this IP address. See WP:VIP.  This is more of the same.  Speedy Delete. Uncle G 12:04, 2005 Feb 23 (UTC)
 * GWB being a pillock has nothing to do with how deleteworthy the article is (very). DS 13:26, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Preposterous article in the english wikipedia. Delete Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 13:51, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologisms not in real use. Bad organizing principle for a list. Not encyclopedic and no potential to become encyclopedic. Dpbsmith (talk) 15:16, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unencyclopedic and useless article. Carrp | Talk 15:18, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, It's all been said. Inter 15:54, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * 217.33.207.195 (talk &bull; contribs) is a serial vandal. Probably worthy of permablock. Delete. jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 16:49, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. &mdash; Brim 18:27, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only preposterous word in the English language is "preposterous". --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 19:24, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to inherently funny words (on the off chance someone ever looks up this specific term) - but scrap these made-up terms. --BD2412 22:40, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article is completely useless. I think none of the words even exist. I don't think this is even worth redirecting. 193.167.132.66 12:46, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Subluxation of the article produces osteochondral crepitus of the margo acetabularis. -Ashley Pomeroy 22:28, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Serious candidate for BJAODN. vlad_mv 03:43, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nonsense. cesarb 04:14, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV that doesn't even include preposterous as a preposterous word. Tygar 07:40, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dcfleck
 * DeleteLukeSurl 20:07, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.