Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prerna Kohli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Source assessment shows at least some non trivial independent reliable coverage by each source, which can be combined to meet notability guidelines per WP:BASIC. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:49, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Prerna Kohli

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable individual, fail of WP:GNG. Awards cited in the article are non-notable. nearlyevil 665  14:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  nearlyevil  665  14:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions.  nearlyevil  665  14:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  nearlyevil  665  14:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:58, 16 August 2021 (UTC)


 * seem to be reliable sources; I'm not clear why the award is non-notable; we often treat things like 100 Women (BBC) as suggesting notability. Furius (talk) 12:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment That first TOI source has no byline and appears to be the same promotional bio that appears on her website in the "About" section. Per the second TOI source, the awardees "were selected by the women and child development ministry", and the President hosted a lunch for them, so this may need some clarification if the article is kept. Other sources in the article include what seems like an advertorial from Silicon India, which states in its About Us section: "Siliconindia has cemented the US-INDIA technology boom and provided the most relevant and critical content for this ecosystem by projecting stories of burgeoning entrepreneurs, outstanding technologists, and accomplished CEOs, along with business analysis and opinions specifically impacting business and technology in India and the U.S. [...] Over the past 22 years, the edition has recognized thousands of such companies and has become a powerful platform for proud entrepreneurs," a Tedx Talk she gave, a link to purchase the book she wrote, and the citation for the book she wrote. On the other hand, there are sources in the article that suggest she may have WP:BASIC notability as an expert, e.g. Free Press Journal, 2021, India Today, 2020, TOI, 2016, and there are twenty links to news articles I have not yet closely reviewed on her website in the Other Media section that might further support WP:BASIC notability. Beccaynr (talk) 00:37, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of notability. The References provided here either paid articles or press releases look at 'Free Press Journal', 'Siliconindia' and India 'Today'. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO.GermanKity (talk) 10:49, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment This source assessment table reviews sources that make a WP:SECONDARY assessment of her as an expert, including articles from mainstream news sources listed on her website, as noted above, and others found during an online search:
 * There also appear to be additional independent and reliable sources available, similarly quoting her as an expert in varying amounts of depth. Beccaynr (talk) 20:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * There also appear to be additional independent and reliable sources available, similarly quoting her as an expert in varying amounts of depth. Beccaynr (talk) 20:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Absolutely fails WP:GNG. References are not in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. DJRSD (talk) 04:48, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:29, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve, per the source assessment table above, which supports WP:BASIC notability as an expert by multiple independent and reliable sources, and is WP:SECONDARY commentary, as well as the award, which adds support to her notability. WP:BASIC states If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability, and these are not trivial mentions. Beccaynr (talk) 03:15, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Certainly meets WP:BASIC notability as a clinical psychologist expert. Acrols (talk) 08:29, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, the source analysis above shows that at least WP:BASIC is met. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 12:45, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Sidenote, I wouldn't consider The New Indian Express to be reliable, they are already suspected to carry undisclosed advertisements masked as news and their article seems to affirm that suspicion. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 12:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.