Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) seminaries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —  Za  wl  15:17, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) seminaries

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced since forever, no notability. Tagged for merge, but nothing really worth keeping Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. I can see is valid as a list of seminaries of a major religious denomination. Deathlibrarian (talk) 07:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 06:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 06:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. It is a list-article corresponding to Category:Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) seminaries, and it lists numerous Wikipedia-notable (they all have articles) seminaries.  There are sources in those linked articles which do not have to be repeated in the list-article.  The gist of guideline wp:CLT is that Categories, List-articles, and Navigation templates are complementary and desirable. --Doncram (talk) 05:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep -- I am sure this must be verifiable, though currently unreferenced. The seminaries of a major denomination is certainly a notable topic.  I cannot find the merge discussion, but I would oppose merger to the denomination, which is already a large enough article.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Right about there seeming to be no Merger proposal at Talk page of either article. Upon conclusion of this AFD, assuming "Keep" decision, would the closer please remove the merger tags, too.  Of course someone can create a valid new merger proposal at any time, if they will actually take time to create a proper discussion. --Doncram (talk) 08:41, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.