Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presbyterian Church Business Administrators Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). Cirt (talk) 07:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Presbyterian Church Business Administrators Association

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable organisation. Low double digits in the unofficial (but in this case useful) Google test. Deprodded after 7.12 days. Abductive (talk) 20:28, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Question: Can this be deleted since prod was contested after the 7-day period lapsed? KuyaBriBri Talk 20:33, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I doubt it. If this AfD is decided in favor of deletion, then any attempt to recreate the article can be met with db-repost. Mentioning the elapsed time since prod is a hint to the admins that there is a backlog in Category:Proposed_deletion_as_of_4_June_2009. Abductive (talk) 20:41, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge into Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) I would like to see this material kept. I am not finding enough independent sources (here's one, not public: ), so in my opinion, this solidly fails to be notable.  However, this source:, although definitely not independent, is (in my opinion) reliable.  This and the organization's site itself seem more than adequate for sourcing text about the PCBAA in a sub-section of some other page.  WP:SELFPUB seems to cover this situation--use of self-published sources ON themselves.  The PCUSA church is very solidly notable so I see no problem with including a paragraph or two on the PCBAA on the PCUSA's main page, using that source and the PCBAA's website as sources.  Cazort (talk) 00:07, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:39, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:39, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect from here as per TexasAndrod above. Non-notable in its own right unless sources turn up.  Springnuts (talk) 13:01, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.