Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presbyterian Medical Care Mission


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirected to Abilene, Texas as a result of the merge performed by DGG. SwisterTwister  talk  01:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Presbyterian Medical Care Mission

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable group and I haven't found any other relevant and significant sources aside from the two present. The first reference is pure advertising and the second provides significant content such as the history but it appears that this is the only appropriate reference. Google newspapers found one small mention here. There is a link here that mentions "Medical Care Mission" but not Presbyterian, but it is a small mention nevertheless. However, it may have been the relevant Medical Care Mission as this news article contains the same address as the first news link that I provided. Google News also found one dead link here (at the top of the page, first result) but it wasn't archived at the KTXS website or web.archive.org. It is not surprising that there are few sources, considering that the group is religion-affiliated and based from a church. SwisterTwister  talk  01:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 10:29, 17 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments. It appears that this medical clinic is now severed from the church that founded it.  We have kept larger hopsitals, such as Articles for deletion/San Jose Hospital & Trauma Center.  I am not sure if this clinic is big enough to be notable. Bearian (talk) 20:13, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)


 * redirect to a new section on health care that I just now added to the article on Abilene, Texas. Socially significant but not by itself encyclopedically notable. Hospitals and health clinics are a problem, for there is rarely much to be found in the way of sourcing.  I agree with SwisterTwister's analysis that there is not enough substantial coverage here for the GNG.  In cases such as this, like Berian, I go to some extent by size, & it consists of only 14 professionals, including 2 physicians and 1.5 dentists. I'd like to include subjects like this, but we usually do not include them as separate articles. We can usually find another way, so people looking for the subject will find some basic information and links to additional. (The nominator asked me to come here, as there were insufficient comments)   DGG ( talk ) 19:00, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Abilene, Texas; merge has already been performed by DGG. Good solution. --MelanieN (talk) 01:17, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 01:20, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 01:20, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.