Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prescott Studio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:11, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Prescott Studio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP. I can't find any significant coverage online, though there are a few mentions in directories. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 21:25, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Theopolisme   ( talk )  23:45, 4 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete There's only one word for articles like this.  Ohconfucius  ping / poke 07:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * It may have some promotional writing in it, but I don't think it counts as a page that is "exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic" per CSD G11. The promotional parts could be fixed by editing, but there's no way to fix a lack of notability. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 09:09, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.