Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PresentAll


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Protected against recreation. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 19:45, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

PresentAll

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Promotion for non-notable company. Has been speedied four times before (including as Presentall). There are no signs of notability that I have come across. Haakon (talk) 10:46, 4 May 2010 (UTC) Please explain what would be needed to show that there are signs of notability. PresentAll has been published on numerous sites and this article was written as an informative article explaining that PresentAll is a web conferencing solution on the internet. There could be more detail added about PresentAll but the last time that effort was made the article was deleted for reasons of being slanted. I would like to comply with the rules but need a little help understanding what you would like to see. Please let me know what we can do to not be marked for deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.103.240.145 (talk) 21:03, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt, and what we have now probably still qualifies for speedy deletion. The current text makes no minimal claim for the importance of this organization.  It's mostly filler text burbling about the importance of video conferencing, not talking about this business at all: Some video conferencing software allows participants to participate in the webinar or web conference through audience interaction such as: polling, question and answer sessions, and joint presentation efforts. More than 40% of people in the U.S. workforce are taking fewer trips. More than 70% are interested in alternatives to travel. 63 percent rate access to collaboration technology as very important.  Uses the non-word "webinar".  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete with salt (but no vinegar) Two refs: One is the company, the other is about Web conferencing and doesn't mention the company. Nice summary description of Web Conferencing in the article, but precious little about the company. If the creator can find refs that prove to us that PresentAll is the ultimate in the field, fair enough. With four speedies, I feel that he is either not listening to the message, or that he just can't find any. Peridon (talk) 16:21, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and salt. I'll take Smerdis' G4 on faith, agree with the A7, and G11's also arguable.  (For newer contributors, the alphabet soup refers to this policy).— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  18:34, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:CORP for the answer to this. Haakon (talk) 21:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Is the type of link that was just added with the information provided considered to be notable? I am sure I can put together whatever information is provided I just don't know exactly what I need to put in here. I appreciate your help in getting this resolved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.103.240.145 (talk) 22:15, 4 May 2010 (UTC) Please note I am not looking to start a fight with this question. What is the difference between the PresentAll posting and the posting about Yuuguu. Yuuguu did not get deleted. I am wondering what I need to do so that the PresentAll page will not be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.103.240.145 (talk) 23:03, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete + Salt (and lots of it!) - Clearly non notable, spouts 200% rubbish about itself with a massive COI attached, bury it, burn it and soak with weedkiller.  Barking Fish  Talk to me | My contributions 22:24, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * While the existence of other articles is not really all that strong of an argument, Yuuguu unfortunately has gotten reviewed by CNet and PCWorld, and current consensus seems to still be that such coverage is enough to pass muster. The current Yuuguu article does not really reflect that well, though.  (I would have nominated it for deletion on your lead, but when I looked and found those texts I figured it may not be worth the bother.  But we really need to set much higher and bright line barriers when it comes to promotional techcruft and back-office software.)  At any rate, if you have reviews of your software in reliable publications outside the trade, the best thing to do would be to let us know about them. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 23:28, 4 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per everyone, and in answer to the above about Yuuguu, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:25, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.