Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preshafood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  00:47, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Preshafood

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No significant coverage to meet WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 00:29, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:50, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agreed by LibStar. CastJared (talk) 00:38, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies,  and Australia. Skynxnex (talk) 02:42, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: notable, SIGCOV exists, presumed notable. Significant coverage of the business' expansion to the UK, and of a toxin scandal in Hong Kong 2017. Have addressed some of the NPOV issues through edits. Please WP:BEFORE Jack4576 (talk) 11:36, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I'm not confident with the sources that Jack has added. Sources 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6 are all largely interviews, source 2 describes the technology used but doesn't talk about the company much, and sources 7 and 8 have only a few sentences each regarding the company. In my opinion, all of these fail WP:SIGCOV. JML1148 (Talk &#124; Contribs) 06:37, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails GNG and CORP. JML's source eval is correct, none of the sources provided in the article or by the Keep vote come close to meet SIGCOV addressing the subject -the corp - directly and indepth. A few sentences do not meet SIGCOV for notability, they simply show existence. I trust Jack's BEFORE was as exhaustive and they presented no sources with SIGCOV, so BEFORE has shown nothing.  // Timothy :: talk  06:56, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources are interviews where most of the coverage is in the words of the company or its people, or do not provide significant coverage of the company. Peter James (talk) 15:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable company. Doesn`t meet GNG and CORP. Some articles cover News Website's paid advertising news.--Loewstisch (talk) 16:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.