Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presidential Initiative for Artificial Intelligence & Computing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 15:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Presidential Initiative for Artificial Intelligence & Computing

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:PROMO - I believe not everything in this world deserves a WP page. No WP:LASTING — Saqib ( talk  |  contribs ) 19:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib  ( talk  |  contribs ) 19:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Business, Education,  and Computing.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  00:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Relisting, please do not rename an article that is being discussed at an AFD. It complicates closure and relisting. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 07:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Rename to identify this as being a Pakistan initiative. — Maile (talk) 02:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ — Saqib ( talk  |  contribs ) 09:34, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Notable initiative initiated by the President of Pakistan. I think it should be kept. Wikibear47 (talk) 13:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I agree, it' was a cool project but I think we prioritize WP:GNG over WP:ATA. While there is some press coverage, BUT it's not sig/in-depth enough to meet WP:GNG. — Saqib ( talk  I  contribs ) 14:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep While I understand the nominator's concerns, this clearly meets the GNG, and sources like from 2021 show that it is still relevant to tech education in Pakistan. The article doesn't seem very promotional to me, and adding some of the criticism from that source I linked would help. This isn't some initiative that was announced and then disappeared – as far as I can tell, it is still operating and has a large number of students (in the thousands).  Toadspike   [Talk]  10:19, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I have added three sentences of (largely) criticism from that source. I hope that addresses some of the PROMO concerns. Toadspike   [Talk]  10:32, 22 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.