Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Press Cleaners


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Press Cleaners

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article does not provide any statement of why this particular company satisfies corporate notability, and has a promotional tone. If the promotional portions were removed, not much would be left. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article on a recent start-up business, describing its funding and business model but without indicating a basis for encyclopaedic notability. The references are a mix of local and start-up coverage, and I am not finding better. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the above. 512tech.com article relies on quotations/interview with one of the founders and is not an intellectually independent reference. The bizjournals reference relies on their website for information, fails WP:ORGIND. And the kens5.com reference also relies on an interview and fails WP:ORGIND. Overall, topic fails WP:NCORP and GNG. -- HighKing ++ 16:03, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - De facto advertisement for a newish, small-scale, run of the mill cleaning company. Should have been led off to die at PROD, probably. Carrite (talk) 14:58, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Promotional tone. Not enough evidence of notability. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 23:14, 29 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.