Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Press Play On Tape (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep/withdrawn (non-admin close). Stalwart 111  13:46, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Press Play On Tape (2nd nomination)
AfDs for this article:
 * Articles for deletion/Press Play on Tape
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

has been deleted before and this just seems to be a mirror of that page (it is in fact a complete duplicate, even retaining its old talk page). I cannot see any new sources establishing notability (just a few press notices about music events that mention them). Slatersteven (talk) 12:38, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - The Berlingske and Independent sources, to my knowledge, haven't been used before. But the most important thing is that I have systematically examined the sources and found at least three nontrivial ( significant) sources about this band and have indicated such on the talk page. The Independent and CNN could also be labeled significant, making it five. In the previous discussion the editors failed to examine the sources in depth. I am also awaiting word on a 2012 German article to see if it is significant. Plus there is a journal article which may count as another one. WhisperToMe (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Significant means more then a paragraph in an article about the subject. Also youtbue is not RS (as has been said before). At lest one of your other sources may be very dubious. I shall take that to RSN.Slatersteven (talk) 12:54, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * So Berlingske, TV2, and Computerworld all have over a paragraph, making it three. I'll check definitions. The journal article has a discussion on RSN. WhisperToMe (talk) 12:57, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * WP:Notability defines it as ""Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, so no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.[1]" so look at CNN and the Independent. They discuss aspects of the band in a manner above a trivial mention. WhisperToMe (talk) 13:02, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I have to check them because I have not heard of them. I am also having trouble finding your Computerworld source in the article. I have checked and Berlingske and TV2 appears to be good sources.Slatersteven (talk) 13:03, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * http://www.computerworld.dk/art/41324/commodore-64-melodier-hitter-paa-youtube is Computerworld WhisperToMe (talk) 13:05, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

It seems we have some notable mentions, I withdraw the AFD.Slatersteven (talk) 13:13, 25 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.