Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pressing (sexual activity)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:05, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Pressing (sexual activity)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

uncited, unverifiable original research which reads like a how-to and was created with the edit summary "I've done this once and I had an eight minute orgasm. I want other people to know about this" Exploding Boy (talk) 05:34, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Comment this is almost an A10, as the article on ejaculation my usually trusty memory has failed me masturbation contains the vast majority some and here too of this information already. At best, this would essentially be a merge and delete, because the subject is notable and verifiable enough (oh, the sorts of things one learns in abnormal psychology) to be included there. I'll have a look through both pages, and see what can be done. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 05:52, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Just because it is original research doesn't make it necessarily right or wrong. Look, all I'm trying to do is show other males how to achieve longer orgasms. I had such an unbelievable experience doing this that I tried to make the most encyclopedic as I can. I can't cite or verify it because I am the only person who knows about this! And I am telling you now, just because I'm the only person who knows about this, it does not make it not relevant. If anything, cite the page with the tag, "contains original research", but do not delete the page.Thank you.Mackerni888 (talk) 05:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The problem is that Original research is not permitted on Wikipedia, and Wikipedia is also not a how-to. There are other websites where you can discuss this if you like.  Exploding Boy (talk) 05:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you redirect me to the websites where I could reach people and explain this? Mackerni888 (talk) 05:59, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Google is your friend. Exploding Boy (talk) 06:06, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I just looked at the ejaculation page and I couldn't find anything on it. Please show me where the information is. Mackerni888 (talk) 05:59, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I stand somewhat corrected; look at the bottom of the men's section, last paragraph. That's what I was thinking of.  Whatever is in this article, if it can be sourced, would probably fit there quite well. The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 06:02, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * See Orgasm control. Exploding Boy (talk) 06:06, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * That's probably where it belongs. But I don't actually see anything about blocking the vas deferens in it. I guess that would make it a DIY, which Wikipedia is not. I guess the page should just be deleted then. I just wish I had a medium to reach a larger mass about it. Mackerni888 (talk) 06:11, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * If it can be sourced, it actually seems like it'd fit well in both places; a brief mention at the general page, and a more detailed explanation at the orgasm control page. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 06:12, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I submitted my story of it on a website, but I highly doubt that website will be able to be used as a source. I don't know how to source it in any other way. If anyone can find a source, delete this page, and add information about doing this in those two pages, I would feel much better about the whole thing. Mackerni888 (talk) 06:27, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no evidence that this practice, beneficial as it may be, is notable under this or any other name. This is close to speedy delete material. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  07:37, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, appears to be a neologism. Per author's comment above, I can't cite or verify it because I am the only person who knows about this! Hence, violates WP:V. -- Kinu t /c  07:39, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It isn't as new and novel as the author thinks it is, but in any case an encyclopedia isn't the place to announce your "new" ideas to the world. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete this ejaculatory technique per Exploding Boy. Drmies (talk) 01:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.