Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pressman Advertising Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Randykitty (talk) 16:30, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Pressman Advertising Limited

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Relies almost entirely of self-published and affiliated sources with no evidence of passing CORPDEPTH.  SITH   (talk)   22:01, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * So, you did not notice the refs 5 to 10 that look possible independent reliable sources that I've just restored a few minutes ago but they need fixing. Im not voting until I've checked them out but this is a public company so it may be notable Atlantic306 (talk) 22:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:53, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment:, yes, I did. See below a source analysis.


 * Note that the URLs of the sources which either redirect to their homepage or display a 404 error all contain key words from existing sources like number 10 which suggest they were also press releases.
 * Many thanks,  SITH   (talk)   11:45, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Agree with your assessment of references 1-5 and 10, will try to fix refs 6-9 later today for assessment, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 14:58, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Refs 6 and 7 work now, but couldn't fix 8 and 9. No 6 is probably the best one but there doesn't seem to be enough coverage in rs unless someone finds more, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 06:36, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.