Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pressurised staircase


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Drmies (talk) 03:09, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Pressurised staircase

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Written like an essay, not notable.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  16:59, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. Next to Google book search hits using the article title, there are many Google hits for "Pressurized stairwell": . Unfortunately, many of the news items are behind paywalls, but my first impression is that the topic is notable. --Lambiam 20:36, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:GHITS.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  20:42, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Are you implying that you examined all these already, and determined none are reliable sources providing non-trivial coverage? --Lambiam 21:57, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 12:47, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Several references already establish notability. I have added another one. The article requires clean-up. Axl  ¤  [Talk]  14:37, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 17:42, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep The topic seems to be notable (as well as important and interesting--which don't count here). I'm not sure if this is the best title however and article could use help but don't delete.BigJim707 (talk) 18:07, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep – but move to Pressurized stairwell or Stairwell pressurization as being far more common names – where the latter particularly predominates in books and scholarly articles. --Lambiam 23:55, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Why not the formal name for the thing that's actually in the article? Uncle G (talk) 09:02, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You mean Smokeproof enclosure? Fine with me. --Lambiam 18:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.