Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prestige


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Prestige (disambiguation).   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 01:26, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Prestige

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is basically a term that is better suited for Wiktionary. While sources may be found on it, its likely not to have much more that wouldn't be found in a dictionary. Wikipedia is for encyclopedic content. We have Wiktionary for dictionary content. ∞ 陣  内  Jinnai  19:31, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * agree wiktionary is proably a better place.Nofatlandshark (talk) 21:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Prestige (disambiguation) per DICTDEF. The page gives only a definition, and seem unlikely to become more than that. Cnilep (talk) 04:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Not notable enough for its own article per wp:notdic. Redirect to Prestige (disambiguation) or prestige. Chris the Paleontologist  (talk &#124; contribs) 21:36, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.