Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prestige (studio)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:48, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Prestige (studio)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable ROTM pornography production company, with primary sources only supporting it. No encyclopaedic content to salvage. Fails WP:GNG / WP:CORP. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:39, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete as there is a lack of substantial secondary coverage in multiple reliable sources which is directly about the company so that WP:CORPDEPTH is not passed at this time, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 01:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and A-306 rationale. Kolma8 (talk) 23:25, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Rogermx (talk) 14:12, 19 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.