Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prestige Management (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles (talk) 16:35, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Prestige Management
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non notable company - fails WP:CORP, only hits appear to be to US property management company Codf1977 (talk) 16:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: no refs in the article, no refs to find.  Dewritech (talk)  15:46, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Completely non-notable. No references. Was created by the company themselves. Christopher Connor (talk) 00:30, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete If they genuinely manage the groups the article claims, there should be no problem with citation. Instead, we get two sentences.  The first step to passing wikipedia's notability guidelines is to actually TRY to cite that something is notable.  In this case, there is no try - only delete. -Markeer 01:16, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.