Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preston City Wrestling Tag Team Championship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per consensus. Discounting one "keep" comment added without any explanation. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Preston City Wrestling Tag Team Championship

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

None of the references given here are independent of the subject. Subject does not appear to meet the notability criteria for a sporting event. Failing the appearance of reliable, independent, non-trivial sources, I propose it be deleted. KDS 4444 Talk  08:02, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:20, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Fixed the References.


 * Delete There is no signficant independent coverage of these events or title. The only sources are from the promotion and from cagematch.net which just gives the results. This could be merged or redirected into the promotion's article. The other events mentioned at Preston City Wrestling (Preston City Wrestling Heavyweight Championship and Preston City Wrestling Cruiserweight Championship) also have no coverage except for a listing of results at cagematch.Mdtemp (talk) 14:40, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages due to the above reasoning:Peter Rehse (talk) 15:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Non notable local event Seasider91 (talk) 17:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep If the promotion has a wiki page then its titles should have wiki pages that's just common sense, im fine with the pages being deleted if the promotions page is deleted as well. This way we can avoid situations like this in the future. Actually ive found a website with all PCW event results on it, https://wrestleropesuk.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/results-from-preston-city-wrestling-pcw_uk-no-retreat-no-surrender-night-two-new-champion/
 * Not really. No comment on the value of the main page but there is nothing wrong with including the championship information there.  Subpages need to stand on their own right.Peter Rehse (talk) 08:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay so then should the title history just be put on the main page then?? I don't mind moving everything across its not a massive hassle. Also if another page has the title history on the main page I would like I link just to see what other people have done.
 * I would wait to see how this AfD goes before doing that but yes. That would only serve to strengthen the main page anyway which is not that big.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:46, 15 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.141.13 (talk) 08:30, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Why? SwisterTwister   talk  05:19, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as this is still questionable for solid notability for its own article. SwisterTwister   talk  05:19, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.