Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preston treend


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Preston treend

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of WP:SIGCOV and non-WP:ROUTINE coverage, fails WP:NSPORTS. PROD removed by page creator. RA 0808 talkcontribs 17:29, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions.  RA 0808  talkcontribs 17:29, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions.  RA 0808  talkcontribs 17:29, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  RA 0808  talkcontribs 17:30, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete appears to be a WP:COI judging by the creator's username. Could be a candidate for WP:A7. 86.3.174.49 (talk) 18:03, 11 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Preston Treend does not deserve to be deleted from wikipedia. Many sources accreditate his legitimacy in the sports and coaching world. He deserves to have his own wikipedia page for his success. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fansofpreston (talk • contribs) 12:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence that the subject of this biography meets notability criteria per WP:BIO.  This just some of this teacher's students having a bit of fun.  Edgeweyes (talk) 13:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Mr. Edgeweyes, this is simply not true. Preston was a great wrestler and deserves a wiki page. Fansofpreston (talk) 16:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)FansOfPreston
 * Delete - per nom. Nikki  ♥  311   22:24, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete He may be a nice guy and a fine coach, but nothing shows he's WP notable. Papaursa (talk) 03:29, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG DarjeelingTea (talk) 20:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG.  CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.