Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pretend Genius


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  Citi Cat   ♫ 04:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Pretend Genius

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

belatedly contested prod, article restored: prod concern was: "The topic may not meet the general notability guidelines and the article may be deleted if not edited to include reliable source material. To meet the general notability guidelines, please add material from reliable sources that are independent of Pretend Genius" with which I agree, so Delete. Carlossuarez46 01:31, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete small context that fails WP:ORG, possible to be a WP:SPAM. Carlosguitar 01:50, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete In response to a COIN post, I searched for info on the topic. Not finding any, I prodded the article. There are some mentions at guardian.co.uk. However, there is not enough reliable source material for the article to meet WP:N andWP:A. -- Jreferee    t / c  01:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Guardian gives only a passing mention of this press, and the current form of the article makes no claim of notability. The article might be kept if anyone can add reliable sources to show the importance of the topic before the close of the AfD. It is odd that so many articles about publishers are weakly written and sound like advertisements. EdJohnston 11:27, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.