Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pretty Princess Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 04:58, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Pretty Princess Party

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article about a video game that does not meet the criteria of WP:GNG. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment I withhold my opinion until we see whether reliable sources review the game, since its release is tomorrow.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 04:44, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Agree with the comment above. Probably should wait with deleting it for a few months. Kolma8 (talk) 17:59, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete no objections to recreate if it becomes notable in the future. Per WP:CRYSTAL articles do not wait for notability to be proven by time.  If the subject becomes notable in the future it can be created then. Jeepday (talk) 18:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - the article is in a sorry state, and it was prematurely created, but there is RS coverage now: Touch Arcade, Siliconera, Gematsu, Famitsu, Gamer.ne.jp--AlexandraIDV 14:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:34, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - While a several of the sources presented above are just announcements of trailer releases and the like, there are a couple of actual reviews there, such as the one from Famitsu, which should be enough for this game to clear the bar of notability. Even if people feel the coverage is still not enough, it should still not be deleted, and should at least be Redirected to Aksys_Games, with the possibility of being restored if more reviews are forthcoming.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Update: I have since my last post here found one more review, and have written up a substantial article using the sources.--AlexandraIDV 21:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:HEY and the excellent work done by Alexandra IDV. — Toughpigs (talk) 21:07, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I am changing my vote, notability has been proven and article is in a much better place thanks to Alexandra. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 21:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep after the reliable coverage demonstrated in IDV's rewrite. Regards  Spy-cicle💥   Talk? 19:55, 16 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.