Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prhizzm (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Splash talk 21:43, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Prhizzm

 * Relisting debate per DRV; I have no opinon on this matter. Archive DRV. - Mailer Diablo 17:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable artist and per WP:MUSIC. --Strothra 18:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * If the additional information brought forward in the DRV is added to the article, I'll say keep. This would be a change to my original vote (a weak delete). Ac@osr 19:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Disclosure: I am a main contributor to the article and in fact started it. Artist is notable, at least meets the WP:Music criteria in spirit, and probably meets them in fact. Prhizzm has two substantial releases on a notable electronic label, has been featured on the CBC and BBC, as well as in Eye Weekly, a popular entertainment weekly in Toronto. See the deletion review for my full argument for keeping the article and references to the claims.   O Z L AWYER    talk   19:20, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:MUSIC and WP:VAIN. A few EP's doesn't make him notable. -- P199 23:28, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Again, WP:MUSIC is a guideline which sets out a series of arguments for notability that this band meets. How, exactly, does deleting "per WP:MUSIC" work with that in mind? --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 20:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete while i've heard of this artist (and seen him perform in TO) his insignificant number of releases on labels which themselves are insignificant does not help him pass the WP:MUSIC guidelines. The only label he has released on with any claim to notability is Benbecula (and even then they're barely notable outside the genre). Even more sad is the biography posted by his label is equally pathetic in content. Phrizzm doesnt come close to the popularity or notability of Venetian Snares (to compare to another Toronto music act). Sorry, just not worthy of a bio on WP yet per guidelines.  ALKIVAR &trade;[[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 02:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per my reasoning on the original debate as well as the AfD. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:43, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:MUSIC easily. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 20:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep even though the article is inadequate, the musician appears to meet the minimal qualifications for inclusion. The article, though, is in drastic need of improvement. Ande B 20:27, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * When I have the time I'll do a proper revamp of the article to satisfy the request of Ac@osr and the concerns of Ande B.  O Z L AWYER    talk   01:24, 29 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.