Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pride of Lions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Jim Peterik.  Sandstein  17:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Pride of Lions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Simply put: non-notable band. Trillfendi (talk) 23:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:45, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:45, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - There has been a recent effort by a few fans to create new and overly crufty articles on everything associated with Survivor. This one is a minor side project and is already mentioned briefly at the article for notable member Jim Peterik. That is sufficient because the band did not receive enough reliable media notice to justify an article. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 02:05, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:33, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Please don't delete this entry. I didn't find the information anywhere and do not consider this to be a "non-notable band" at all. This band is more of the modern melodic rock genre than the 80's pop genre. Just because you have never heard of this band doesn't qualify this entry for deletion.Mtandls (talk) 23:42, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment “WP:ILIKEIT” is not valid keep criterion. There are millions of articles on this website none of us know about, that doesn’t mean they are exempt from notability rules. And yes, I have heard of this band. The fact is, they have no reliable sources, no significant coverage, and this article is all of one sentence. Trillfendi (talk) 00:04, 6 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete There are numerous niche genre sources that contain reviews and standard fare new release coverage, but they are small time publications/website, or fan blogs, and they are all related to Jim Peteriks involvement, so perhaps a redirect to him. But there just isn't enough significant, reliable coverage recognition. ShelbyMarion (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to Jim Peterik. Most of the relevant press seems to focus on Peterik, not the band, so a merge may be inevitable. 24.84.14.158 (talk) 01:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Sounds like the best case scenario here. Trillfendi (talk) 02:00, 12 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge to Jim Peterik; a functional WP:ATD-M. Source searches are not providing sufficient coverage to qualify a standalone article. North America1000 03:09, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge to keep content, since imo the article shouldn't remain on its own --DannyS712 (talk) 03:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.