Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priessnitz (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete, which defaults to keep. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Priessnitz (band)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable under WP:MUSIC. No notable sources. Delete Undeath (talk) 04:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 
 * Comment sources don't need to be notable, article subjects do. Band's name is also a common surname, so hard to search for, but the former leader seems to get a reasonable amount of coverage, for example :  cab (talk) 07:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.   cab (talk) 07:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 19:40, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb       "Talk" 23:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Unsure.  Unable to find many sources in English, but this band may pass WP:Music #7 (Has become the most prominent representative of a notable style or of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.  This probably constitutes trivial coverage but these links show they have played rock festivals in Prague. , .  I've added an AMG link to the article. .  ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 18:03, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The AMG link shows three releases and established notability for me.  ♫ Cricket02 (talk) 07:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keilana | Parlez ici 03:32, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per coverage uncovered above and to combat systematic bias against articles where most sources are likely to exist in a language other than English. Catchpole (talk) 18:04, 24 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.