Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primary Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. DS 14:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Primary Technology
advertisement Travelbird 00:28, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete ...next to no info, and no indication of notability. Artw 00:38, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete pernom & Artw --Nick Y. 00:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP Jammo (SM247) 01:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Richardcavell 01:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete a small local firm only. Tyrenius 01:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a failure of WP:CORP AdamBiswanger1 01:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ADS and WP:CORP--TBC TaLk?!? 02:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, ad, fails WP:CORP. --Coredesat talk 02:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Phileas 06:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete what he said. MichaelBillington 06:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - clear Ad. and nn --WinHunter (talk) 07:19, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP. &mdash; ዮም   (Yom)  |  contribs  •  Talk  •  E  08:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CORP -- N  scheffey (T/C) 10:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, blatant advertisement --Anthony5429 12:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with an axe. Company gets zero google news hits, so I'm disinclined to believe they're noteworthy.  I can always be reconvinced. WilyD 14:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.