Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primary school sadpur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sadpur, Uttar Pradesh. czar 02:21, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Primary school sadpur

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable primary school. Nothing but an advert too. Could in fact snow merge this. Kingoflettuce (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  16:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  16:10, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Elementary school school with little to no significant coverage in reliable sources, failing WP:NSCHOOL— UY Scuti Talk  12:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge selectively & redirect to the village We should indeed do what we usually do,and that, not delete, is the standard practice. .. When there's an article for a school district we use that for the merge, but otherwise to  the locality. Theres always a locality article.  DGG ( talk ) 16:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Close comment - My apologies I accidentally closed this as Keep as the nominator mass nominated a ton of school AFDs (all which were Keeps) and this ended up with them by complete accident so I've obviously reopened. – Davey 2010 Talk 15:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak merge to Sadpur, Uttar Pradesh – DGG is right; this is the standard course of action for non-notable primary schools, which this one is. Quite frankly, this article has more information about the village than it does about the school. However, none of the information is sourced, which makes me hesitate to fully support merging... is any of the information verifiable? Mz7 (talk) 00:16, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.