Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prime Directive Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:42, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Prime Directive Records

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:SIRS, WP:NCORP failure. WP:BEFORE search on Google News and books find no significant independent coverage on the company. "so and so notable person" released on this label can not establish notability per WP:INHERITORG. I see no credible indication of notability for the company itself. Graywalls (talk) 23:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 23:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 23:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 23:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - per the notability guidelines for companies as cited by the nominator. This company released records by a few notable bands, but has never received significant coverage as a company in its own right, and is only found in typical industry directories. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 00:05, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nominator. Not a lot of notability as a company itself. JayzBox (talk) 07:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.