Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prime Time (2015)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:13, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Prime Time (2015)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is about an unreleased film that is not covered in reliable sources. Fails WP:NYF and WP:NF. Winner 42 Talk to me!  13:18, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom —Мандичка YO 😜 20:32, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as TOOSOON, No objections to recreation once more concrete sources & info comes up. – Davey 2010 Talk 21:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per MQS - I was unaware it was gonna be released on the 29th - Don't see much point deleting and personally I don't see much point in moving to Draft as it'll only end up being moved back but meh thats my 2cents on it. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:01, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Draft - Personally see it as an utter waste of time but meh no point ranting about it and it's better than it being deleted. – Davey 2010 Talk 03:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


 * More specific:
 * Director:
 * Producer:
 * Production:
 * Alt: WP:INDAFD Promod Kashyap, Prime Time Saranay Entertainment, Prime Time Prime Time} (2015)


 * Send to draft-space as, while the film is apparently complete and set for release on 3 weeks, it does not have coverage to meet WP:NFF (paragraph 3). Allow  return to asrticle space after release and only if it gets the coverage to meet WP:GNG.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 00:43, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Draftify – As per . North America1000 03:35, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * - Perhaps It's simply my lack of understanding but what would be the point in moving it to draft if after 2 weeks and a few days It'll be moved back again ... It's just a waste of time and effort surely ? – Davey 2010 Talk 03:41, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * My own source searches have not provided significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Two of the three references in the article are not what I would consider to be from reliable sources, and the remaining one, while reliable, does not provide significant coverage. At this time, an article in main namespace is not qualified. North America1000 03:47, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.