Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Primecoin (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural keep (non-admin closure). Citation Needed &#x007C;  Talk  16:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Primecoin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

last one ended in a no consensus, and i beleive this article doesn't meet the requirements to be an article per WP:NOTABLE Guttersville (talk) 11:58, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep we just had this last discussion end three days ago, even though I do support it's deletion under fair means. I'm taking down the AfD notice as a result. Citation Needed  &#x007C;  Talk  12:03, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep as this next AfD is way too soon. Northern Antarctica (₵) 14:32, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep too soon.  BerkeleyLaw1979   15:08, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I've just realized that we could possibly have a fifth damn debate over this coin now, if we count this AfD. If that one ends in a no consensus, my head is going to spin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citation Needed (talk • contribs) 17:19, 4 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy Procedural Keep there is no reason to debate this issue again so soon. Jonpatterns (talk) 21:44, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep. Too soon. Finally, we can agree about a Primecoin AfD! ––Agyle (talk) 04:38, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, nice secondary source coverage. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 15:47, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. This proposal is too close to the 3rd nomination, but Primecoin also has many secondary and tertiary sources.  CarnivorousBunny talk • contribs  19:08, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. If and when Primecoin becomes a mostly irrelevant altcoin, THEN an additional AfD nomination will be in order. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:38B3:1409:5CF1:75A4:1D2A:AB33 (talk) 12:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.